Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease aortic valve prostheses

Keywords: aortic bioprostheses; aortic stenosis; aortic valve replacement

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is still offered to elderly populations despite the potential for structural valve degeneration. Currently, however, there is limited comparative data on the long-term durability of different SAVR prostheses.

Reporting outcomes including repeat aortic valve replacement, prosthetic valve endocarditis and late all-cause mortality, Biancari et al. present key results from a retrospective, non-randomised, propensity-matched comparative analysis of the Trifecta and Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valves. The authors compared the outcomes of 2,216 patients who had undergone the procedure to implant one of the two SAVR prostheses.

Click the link below for an update on the latest research in aortic valve replacement.

Click here to access the full publication

For professional use. For a listing of indications, contraindications, precautions, warnings, and potential adverse events, please refer to the Instructions for Use (consult eifu.edwards.com where applicable).

Edwards devices placed on the European market meeting the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 of the Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC bear the CE marking of conformity.

Edwards, Edwards Lifesciences, the stylized E logo, Carpentier-Edwards, Magna, Magna Ease, PERI, PERIMOUNT and PERIMOUNT Magna are trademarks of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation or its affiliates. All other trademarks or service marks are the property of their respective owners.