Bicuspid aortic valve and aortic aneurysm: timing and lifetime treatment strategy based on age and anatomy

July 7, 2023

Prof. D’Onofrio

Aortic Highlights course

Prof. Borger

Aortic Highlights course, 2023

Prof. Doenst

Edwards Lifesciences at EACTS 2022: State of the art in the treatment of aortic valve regurgitation in young patients

Prof. Ruggero De Paulis

MVT Aortic 2022, vol.1

– First and foremost, not all bicuspid aortic valves are the same

– Many post-operative measurements and goals are included within to help guide you to optimal patient outcomes

– Check out the insight provided about valve-sparing, valve repair, external annuloplasty, and more

Prof. Marjan Jahangiri

MVT Aortic 2022, vol.1

– Shorter time to extubation, shorter length of stay, shorter hospital stays

– Pre-operative strategies to enhance post-operative and follow-up outcomes

– Don’t forget to pay attention to the intra-operative details and work with the entire Heart Team for optimal patient outcomes

Prof. Augusto d’Onofrio

MVT Aortic 2022, vol.1

– Valve-in-valve, TAVI in TAVI, SAVR after TAVI… familiarize yourself with the mid-to-long-term data for each valve type combination, and transparently inform the patients of not only the benefits but also the risks

– Even the experts say, extracting an infected TAVI is extremely difficult, so be sure to choose the original valve wisely

Prof. Hanneke Takkenberg – EACTS 2021

Edwards Lifesciences Symposium

Patients are at the core of the new ESC/EACTS guidelines. The recommendation for patient-focused decision making covers all therapeutic areas. 

Key points include:  

Informed patient choice is crucial

Patient life expectancy and quality of life should be considered

Patient-centred evaluation is at the heart of ensuring informed treatment choice is offered to patients

Prosthetic valve selection should be made during Heart Team evaluation, and with consideration of the patient’s preferences

The patient-centred approach

Patient-centred decision making should be made by a fully collaborative Heart Team, right from clinical evaluation, imaging assessment through to intervention selection. Learn more about the importance of the Heart Team here.  

All pieces of the puzzle need to fit together, to understand patient preferences and robustly diagnose and evaluate each patient, in order to come to a joint decision on treatment choice.

Prosthetic valve selection

To ensure the right treatment for each patient, every time, your patient should be given the opportunity to make an informed choice, and any decisions should be made in close collaboration with the Heart Team. 

Involve your patients when it comes to:  

    • Understanding their lifestyle, any impact of anti-coagulation or the possibility of future re-do surgical, or transcatheter surgery
    • Informing them of the influence of age in valve selection, particularly where life expectancy is less than bioprosthesis durability
    • How valve selection will impact quality of life, whether this is an impact on diet or return to active lifestyle
    • Understanding the potential risks and benefits of any potential intervention

The guidelines give a clear recommendation on when tissue valves should be selected, find out more here 

Edwards, Edwards Lifesciences, and the stylized E logo are trademarks of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 

© 2021 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. All rights reserved. PP–EU-3125 v1.0 

Edwards Lifesciences • Route de l’Etraz 70, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland • edwards.com 

 

The highly anticipated 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease have finally landed.

We are excited to bring you a summary of the main updates, plus the new materials coming soon to support you and your teams in understanding and implementing the changes. 

Key points include:

Treatment recommendations for all patients with severe aortic stenosis to be made by the Heart Team

Intervention options for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Bioprosthetic valves now recommended for those with life expectancy shorter than valve durability

Intervention recommended for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, who remain symptomatic despite guideline-directed medical therapy

Use your experience of severe aortic stenosis to ensure the best patient outcomes

The choice between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) must be made following evaluation of all factors – clinical, anatomical and procedural – weighing the risks and benefits of each approach for all patients with severe aortic stenosis, and after discussion with the patient.

  • SAVR is recommended in younger patients under 75 years, who are low surgical risk
  • TAVI is now recommended for all patients with severe aortic stenosis 75 years or older, who are suitable for transfemoral TAVI, based on clinical trial and registry data.
  • Further Heart Team evaluation is required for all remaining patients – such as those under 75 years with a risk score between 4% and 8%
  • Treatment options have broadened for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, including those with systolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <55%) without another cause.

    Enable more of your patients to live the active lifestyle they desire

    Bioprosthetic valves now have a Class I recommendation for patients with life expectancy lower than the durability of the valve. Now, more of your patients can live a life free from anticoagulation. In addition, bioprosthetic valves may be considered for patients already on long-term novel oral anticoagulants.

    Ensure you meet your patients’ high expectations by offering them the best valve technologies.

    Be courageous, be experienced, be ethical… according to the guidelines!

    Join us from the comfort of your office for a virtual symposium discussing the changes and what they mean for your practice. Eleven speakers from across Europe will cover the implications for the aortic, mitral and tricuspid valves. Click here for the full programme.

    Tuesday 21 September 2021

    3.00–7.45 pm CET

    REGISTER NOW

    Coming soon from Edwards

  • Order for free the 2021 ESC Pocket Guidelines: ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease
  • Find a full summary of the EACTS congress, plus all you need to know from the guidelines
  • Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn to be the first to know more

  • Edwards, Edwards Lifesciences, and the stylized E logo are trademarks or service marks of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation or its affiliates.  All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

    © 2021 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. All rights reserved. NP–EU-0633 v1.0

    Edwards Lifesciences • Route de l’Etraz 70, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland • edwards.com

    Dr. Gianluigi Perri

    MVT Aortic 2021

    Dr. Torsten Christ, Germany 

    Dr. Marco Di Eusanio

    What to know in 2020

    Keywords: aortic stenosis; aortic valve replacement; patient–prosthesis mismatch; rapid-deployment aortic valves

    Severe aortic stenosis in low- and intermediate-risk patients is currently treated by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, SAVR can cause patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM), a condition where a patient’s body surface area is too big compared with the effective orifice area of the implant. This mismatch results in higher transvalvular pressure gradients and is associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes. There is a potential risk of PPM in patients who undergo SAVR due to higher transvalvular pressure gradients, especially if they have a small aortic root.

    Coti et al. studied patients with a small aortic root who underwent SAVR with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve. This single-centre cohort analysis provides useful insights by analysing haemodynamic parameters, survival rates, functional class improvements and PPM incidence.

    Click on the link below to see the outcomes of the EDWARDS INTUITY valve transplant in at-risk patients.

    Click here to access the full publication 

    Important safety information:

    Use of the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve system may be associated with new or worsened conduction disturbances, which may require a permanent cardiac pacemaker implant (PPI). The rate of PPI for the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve is within the range reported in the literature for various rapid deployment valves, but higher than that reported for surgical aortic valves. Physicians should assess the benefits and risks of the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve prior to implantation. See instructions for use for additional information.

    For professional use. For a listing of indications, contraindications, precautions, warnings, and potential adverse events, please refer to the Instructions for Use (consult eifu.edwards.com where applicable).

    Edwards devices placed on the European market meeting the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 of the Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC bear the CE marking of conformity.

    Edwards, Edwards Lifesciences, the stylized E logo, Carpentier-Edwards, EDWARDS INTUITY, and EDWARDS INTUITY Elite are trademarks or service marks of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

    © 2020 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. All rights reserved.

    Edwards Lifesciences • Route de l’Etraz 70, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland • edwards.com