Outcomes of Bentall procedures vs. aortic valve sparing
Prof. Ruggero De Paulis
MVT Aortic 2022, vol.2
– Pros and cons of valve-sparing versus the pros and cons of biological or mechanical Bentall procedures
– Plenty of data with plenty of insights, get ready to take notes
– Experience and confidence reign supreme
– If relevant, don’t forget to plan for future valve-in-valve
Dr. Patrick Klein
MVT Aortic 2022, vol.2
– Listen to what he has to say about total aortic root replacement.
– How can we assess the durability and avoid adverse valve-related events when using mechanical and biological valves?
– Hear about his personal experience using new-generation biological valves in patients 57 ± 7 years old.
Dr. Dashkevich
MVT Aortic 2022, vol.2
– For a patient with endocarditis, should we consider a biological or mechanical prosthesis?
– Briefly see an interesting patient case, accompanied by detailed photos and explanations.
– Don’t forget to pay attention to the anterior mitral leaflet, and strongly consider your coronary reimplantation strategy.
Prof. Alessandro Della Corte
MVT Aortic 2022, vol.1
– Patients with an “ascending” phenotype? A separate vale and ascending graft replacement procedure is an option
– Patients with a “root” phenotype? Consider addressing the root earlier (50 mm root diameter)
– Bentall is still the gold standard, but valve-sparing procedures have similarly good results
Prof. Conal Austin
MVT Aortic 2021
Prof. Alfred Kocher
MVT Aortic 2021